IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199787101683-1686_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two-step intervention to increase mammography among women aged 65 and older

Author

Listed:
  • Janz, N.K.
  • Schottenfeld, D.
  • Doerr, K.M.
  • Selig, S.M.
  • Dunn, R.L.
  • Strawderman, M.
  • Levine, P.A.

Abstract

Objectives. This study evaluated a two-step intervention for mammography screening among older women. Methods. Four hundred and sixty women, identified from physician practices, were randomized to a control or a two- step intervention (physician letter and peer counseling call) group. Women in the intervention group who obtained a mammogram received a grocery coupon. Results. Over the 12 months of the study, more women in the intervention group than in the control group obtained mammograms (38% vs 16%). The most dramatic difference was in the higher odds that women in the intervention group would obtain a mammogram within 2 months (odds ratio = 10.5). Conclusions. The intervention significantly increased screening mammography. Future efforts must be multifaceted and incorporate the unique concerns of older women.

Suggested Citation

  • Janz, N.K. & Schottenfeld, D. & Doerr, K.M. & Selig, S.M. & Dunn, R.L. & Strawderman, M. & Levine, P.A., 1997. "A two-step intervention to increase mammography among women aged 65 and older," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(10), pages 1683-1686.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:10:1683-1686_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:10:1683-1686_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.