IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199787101680-1682_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The contribution of six chronic conditions to the total burden of mobility disability in the Dutch population

Author

Listed:
  • Picavet, H.S.J.
  • Van Den Bos, G.A.M.

Abstract

Objectives. This study assessed the proportions of the burden of mobility disability in the Dutch population that are attributable to musculoskeletal disease, lung diseases, neurological disorders, heart diseases, diabetes, and cancer. Methods. National survey data were analyzed with an elimination technique that combines the results of logistic regression analysis and the disease prevalence. Results. Of the total prevalence of disability (20.5%), 33:7% can be attributed to these six chronic conditions. Musculoskeletal disorders account for the major part, whereas the contribution of cancer is very small. Conclusions. The potential benefits of effective curative or preventive treatments for chronic conditions, in terms of reduction of disability burden in the population, are limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Picavet, H.S.J. & Van Den Bos, G.A.M., 1997. "The contribution of six chronic conditions to the total burden of mobility disability in the Dutch population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(10), pages 1680-1682.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:10:1680-1682_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Hoeck & Johan Van der Heyden & Joanna Geerts & Guido Van Hal, 2013. "Equity in GP and specialist contacts by older persons in Belgium," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 593-602, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:10:1680-1682_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.