IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1996865717-722_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking community sentinel events: Breast cancer mortality and neighborhood risk for advanced-stage tumors in Denver

Author

Listed:
  • Andres, T.L.
  • Baron, A.E.
  • Wright, R.A.
  • Marine, W.M.

Abstract

Objectives. The incidence of related sentinel events-breast cancer mortality and neighborhood-specific morbidity for advanced stage at diagnosis-were calculated for women likely to use a community health center in Denver, Colo. Methods. For the center's service area, neighborhoods (n = 37) were defined by program use. Mortality rates and proportional hazards regression models were estimated for 4189 breast cancer cases recorded between 1979 and 1990. Neighborhood-specific standard morbidity ratios of advanced-stage tumors were based on age-specific rates applied to the entire community. Results. Service area residents were more likely to present with advanced tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4; 95% [CI] = 1.2, 1.5). After adjustment, advanced-stage disease and socioeconomic-demographic status, but not race-ethnicity, contributed significantly to survival. Two neighborhoods (6.5% of the population at risk) with standard morbidity ratios of 2.1 (95% CI = 1.3, 3.4) and 1.7 (95% CI = 1.2, 2.5) accounted for 42% of the excess cases of advanced-stage tumors between 1986 and 1990. Conclusions. Neighborhood variation in advanced-stage cancer can serve as the basis for efforts to improve access to breast cancer screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Andres, T.L. & Baron, A.E. & Wright, R.A. & Marine, W.M., 1996. "Tracking community sentinel events: Breast cancer mortality and neighborhood risk for advanced-stage tumors in Denver," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(5), pages 717-722.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:5:717-722_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:5:717-722_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.