IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1995856823-828_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirically based guidelines for moderate drinking: 1-year results from three studies with problem drinkers

Author

Listed:
  • Sanchez-Craig, M.
  • Wilkinson, A.
  • Davila, R.

Abstract

Objectives. The study was conducted to refine guidelines on moderate drinking for problem drinkers, persons whose alcohol use is hazardous or harmful. Information on levels of alcohol intake unlikely to cause problems is useful for health professionals, educators, and policymakers. Methods. Based on their reports of alcohol-related problems, participants in three studies assessing interventions to reduce heavy drinking (144 men, 91 women) were categorized as 'problem-free' or 'problem' drinkers at follow-up. Drinking measures were examined to identify patterns separating these outcome categories. Results. Analyses using 95% confidence intervals for means on drinking measures showed that guidelines should be sex-specific. Based on analyses of positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity, it is recommended that men consume no more than 4 standard drinks in any day and 16 drinks in any week, and that women consume no more than 3 drinks in any day and 12 drinks in any week. Conclusions. These guidelines are consistent with those from several official bodies and should be useful for advising problem drinkers when moderation is a valid treatment goal. Their applicability to the general population is unevaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanchez-Craig, M. & Wilkinson, A. & Davila, R., 1995. "Empirically based guidelines for moderate drinking: 1-year results from three studies with problem drinkers," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(6), pages 823-828.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:823-828_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:823-828_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.