IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1995856771-776_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of the 1987 federal regulations on the use of psychotropic drugs in Minnesota nursing homes

Author

Listed:
  • Garrard, J.
  • Chen, V.
  • Dowd, B.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine prevalence rates of psychotropic drug use by elderly nursing home residents 3 years before and 1 year after implementation of the 1987 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act drug regulations throughout the United States on October 1, 1990. Methods. A cohort study was conducted of elderly nursing home residents, for each of 4 study years (approximately 33 000 residents per year), of all nursing homes (n = 372) in Minnesota certified by Medicare and Medicaid. Data included (1) health status assessment and psychotropic drug use; (2) nursing home and care characteristics; and (3) county geographic and population characteristics. Results. Annual rates of antipsychotic drug use declined by one third over the 4-year period (23%, 22%, 19%, and 15% from 3 years before enforcement of the regulations to 1 year afterward). All differences were statistically significant. Antianxiety use rates were 11%, 12%, 12%, and 12%, respectively, and antidepressant use rates were 14%, 15%, 16%, 16%, respectively, for the 4 years. The latter two classes of drugs were not affected directly by the regulations. Conclusions. Declines in the rates of antipsychotic drug use appear to be associated with anticipation of the regulations the year before and as the result of the regulations the year after the October 1990 implementation. A hypothesized meditation shift to benzodiazepine drugs was not observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Garrard, J. & Chen, V. & Dowd, B., 1995. "The impact of the 1987 federal regulations on the use of psychotropic drugs in Minnesota nursing homes," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(6), pages 771-776.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:771-776_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:771-776_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.