IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1995852183-192_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Glynn, T.J.
  • Shopland, D.R.
  • Manley, M.
  • Lynn, W.R.
  • Freedman, L.S.
  • Green, S.B.
  • Corle, D.K.
  • Graubard, B.
  • Baker, S.
  • Mills, S.L.
  • Chapelsky, D.A.
  • Gail, M.
  • Mark, S.
  • Bettinghaus, E.
  • Orlandi, M.A.
  • McAlister, A.
  • Royce, J.
  • Lewit, E.
  • Dalton, L.T.

Abstract

Objectives. The primary hypothesis of COMMIT (Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation) was that a community-level, multi-channel, 4-year intervention would increase quit rates among cigarette smokers, with heavy smokers (≥25 cigarettes per day) of priority. Methods. One community within each of 11 matched community pairs (10 in the United States, 1 in Canada) was randomly assigned to intervention. Endpoint cohorts totaling 10 019 heavy smokers and 10328 light-to-moderate smokers were followed by telephone. Results. The mean heavy smoker quit rate (i.e., the fraction of cohort members who had achieved and maintained cessation at the end of the trial) was 0.180 for intervention communities versus 0.187 for comparison communities, a nonsignificant difference (one-sided P = .68 by permutation test; 90% test-based confidence interval (CI) for the difference = -0.031, 0.019). For light-to-moderate smokers, corresponding quit rates were 0.306 and 0.275; this difference was significant (P = .004; 90% CI = 0.014, 0.047). Smokers in intervention communities had greater perceived exposure to smoking control activities, which correlated with outcome only for light-to-moderate smokers. Conditions. The impact of this community-based intervention on light-to-moderate smokers, although modest, has public health importance. This intervention did not increase quit rates of heavy smokers; reaching them may require new clinical programs and policy changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Glynn, T.J. & Shopland, D.R. & Manley, M. & Lynn, W.R. & Freedman, L.S. & Green, S.B. & Corle, D.K. & Graubard, B. & Baker, S. & Mills, S.L. & Chapelsky, D.A. & Gail, M. & Mark, S. & Bettinghaus, E. &, 1995. "Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(2), pages 183-192.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:2:183-192_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zuchao Shen & Benjamin Kelcey, 2020. "Optimal Sample Allocation Under Unequal Costs in Cluster-Randomized Trials," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(4), pages 446-474, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:2:183-192_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.