IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199585121706-1709_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The reporting sensitivities of two passive surveillance systems for vaccine adverse events

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenthal, S.
  • Chen, R.

Abstract

To evaluate reporting sensitivities for vaccine adverse events, reporting rates were estimated, by dividing the number of events reported to the Monitoring System for Adverse Events Following Immunization and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in a given period by the number of doses administered or distributed during the same period. Reporting sensitivity was calculated as the ratio of the rates at which events were reported to each passive surveillance system (numerator) and occurred in controlled studies (denominator). Reporting sensitivities were generally better in the public sector than in the private sector. The significant underreporting of known outcomes, together with the nonspecific nature of most adverse event reports, highlights the limitations of passive surveillance systems in assessing the incidence of vaccine adverse events.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenthal, S. & Chen, R., 1995. "The reporting sensitivities of two passive surveillance systems for vaccine adverse events," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(12), pages 1706-1709.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:12:1706-1709_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kimberly M. Thompson & Cassie L. Odahowski, 2016. "The Costs and Valuation of Health Impacts of Measles and Rubella Risk Management Policies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(7), pages 1357-1382, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:12:1706-1709_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.