IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19948481287-1291_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fractures: A population-based study

Author

Listed:
  • Lu-Yao, G.L.
  • Baron, J.A.
  • Barrett, J.A.
  • Fisher, E.S.

Abstract

Objectives. This study was undertaken to examine the patterns of treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fracture. Methods. A 5% national sample of Medicare claims was used to identify patients who sustained hip fractures between 1986 and 1989. In comparing treatment patterns across regions, direct standardization was used to derive age- and race-adjusted percentages. Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to examine short- and long-term survival. Results. In the United States, 64% of femoral neck fractures were treated with arthroplasty; 90% of pertrochanteric fractures were treated with internal fixation. Higher short- and long-term mortality was associated with being male, being older, residing in a nursing home prior to fracture, having a higher comorbidity score, and having a pertrochanteric fracture. Blacks and Whites had similar 90-day postfracture mortality, but Blacks had a higher mortality later on. For femoral neck fracture, internal fixation has a modestly lower short-term mortality associated with it than arthroplasty has. Conclusion. Variation in the treatment of hip fracture was modest. The increased delayed mortality after hip fracture among Blacks requires further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu-Yao, G.L. & Baron, J.A. & Barrett, J.A. & Fisher, E.S., 1994. "Treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fractures: A population-based study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(8), pages 1287-1291.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:8:1287-1291_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:8:1287-1291_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.