IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1994845737-741_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health status differentials in the People's Republic of China

Author

Listed:
  • Lawson, J.S.
  • Lin, V.

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to demonstrate that health status varies markedly in different parts of China. Methods. The main source of data was statistics compiled by the Chinese Ministry for Public Health for 1978 to 1990 regarding causes of death. However, because mortality statistics in China are based on localities that have the capacity to provide data, they are not entirely representative. The international classification of disease categories was also used, together with anatomically based disease descriptions. Rates were calculated using the 1982 and 1990 population censuses. Results. Death rates differ markedly between urban and rural areas. Deaths due to infectious diseases, respiratory diseases, pregnancy and childbirth, and injuries and poisoning are much higher in rural areas; those due to pertussis, dysentery, typhoid, hepatitis, rabies, and anthrax are much more common in the apparently poorer provinces. Schistosomiasis remains a major problem in some provinces. Goiter and cretinism are still major diseases in many parts of China, especially those areas with iodine deficiency. Conclusions. Cause-of-death patterns in Chinese cities are similar to those of industrially developed countries such as Australia, Japan, and the United States. Such patterns in the poorer rural areas are much more typical of those of developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawson, J.S. & Lin, V., 1994. "Health status differentials in the People's Republic of China," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(5), pages 737-741.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:5:737-741_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:5:737-741_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.