IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199484111743-1749_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proposed method for assessing the performance of local public health functions and practices

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, C.A.
  • Moore, K.S.
  • Richards, T.B.
  • Monk, J.D.

Abstract

Objectives. One of the objectives for the nation for the year 2000 requires that 90% of the population be served by a local health department effectively carrying out the core functions of public health. This study proposes a method whereby determinations can be made of the extent to which a local public health jurisdiction is served by core public health functions, as well as the extent to which the functions are rendered by the health department. Methods. Fourteen health departments under longitudinal study between 1979 and 1992 were studied. Respondents in each department completed a survey protocol using 81 indicators linked to standard public health functions and practices. Results are presented in graphic form, which provides a visual profile of public health performance for a local jurisdiction. Results. The graphic profiles successfully differentiate one jurisdiction from another, and within each jurisdiction they differentiate the performance levels of different public health practices. The method enables identification of the full range of public health providers. Conclusions. Current definitions of public health practice have utility for evaluating public health performance. The validity of the proposed method deserves further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, C.A. & Moore, K.S. & Richards, T.B. & Monk, J.D., 1994. "A proposed method for assessing the performance of local public health functions and practices," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(11), pages 1743-1749.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:11:1743-1749_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:11:1743-1749_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.