IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199484101631-1636_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The danger of applying uniform clinical policies across populations: The case of breast cancer in American Indians

Author

Listed:
  • Nutting, P.A.
  • Calonge, B.N.
  • Iverson, D.C.
  • Green, L.A.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined the implications of annual screening mammography for cost and mortality in American Indian populations with differing baseline breast cancer rates. Methods. A decision tree compared annual screening mammography and screening clinical breast examination with referral for diagnostic mammography when appropriate. The decision tree was constructed to examine the effect of different baseline cancer rates, stage at diagnosis, and stage-specific survival. Outcomes included 5-year relative survival, deaths prevented at 5 years, cost per death prevented, and total costs. Results. The findings suggest that the total cost of breast cancer is 3.6 times higher with the screening mammography program but results in a 27.9% reduction in breast cancer deaths over the first 5 years of the program. Both costs and deaths prevented are sensitive to the incidence of breast cancer in the population and are less favorable in the range of incidence seen in American Indians. Conclusions. The cost and impact of a given strategy for cancer screening vary among communities with different disease incidence, stage at diagnosis, and stage-specific survival, as seen in American Indian populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nutting, P.A. & Calonge, B.N. & Iverson, D.C. & Green, L.A., 1994. "The danger of applying uniform clinical policies across populations: The case of breast cancer in American Indians," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(10), pages 1631-1636.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:10:1631-1636_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:10:1631-1636_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.