IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19938391316-1320_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cervical cancer screening in hospitals: The effficacy of legislation in Maryland

Author

Listed:
  • Klassen, A.C.
  • Celentano, D.D.
  • Weisman, C.S.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of the study was to examine the efficacy of a Maryland law requiring Pap testing to be offered during hospital admissions. 'In-reach' strategies emphasize cancer screening within existing health care contacts (such as inpatient stays) rather than additional visits solely for screening. Methods. Data from a 1986 telephone survey of Maryland women were used to examine the effect of hospitalization on self-reported Pap testing in a 3-year period. The effect of hospitalization on screening was examined by age and income to assess whether inpatient screening was more prevalent among certain subgroups of women. Results. For the group as a whole, the odds of Pap screening did not vary with hospitalization. However, among women aged 45 to 54 years with annual household incomes over $20 000, hospitalized women were more likely than nonhospitalized women to report recent Pap tests. For low-income women aged 75 years and older, hospitalization actually decreased the likelihood of reporting Pap tests. Conclusions. Despite legislation, inpatient cervical cancer screening appears to mirror outpatient patterns, leaving elderly and low-income women unscreened. Methods for increasing inpatient Pap testing for underscreened women are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Klassen, A.C. & Celentano, D.D. & Weisman, C.S., 1993. "Cervical cancer screening in hospitals: The effficacy of legislation in Maryland," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(9), pages 1316-1320.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:9:1316-1320_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:9:1316-1320_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.