IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1993834551-555_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chlamydial cervical infection in jailed women

Author

Listed:
  • Holmes, M.D.
  • Safyer, S.M.
  • Bickell, N.A.
  • Vermund, S.H.
  • Hanff, P.A.
  • Phillips, R.S.

Abstract

Objectives. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection in incarcerated adult women has not been reported. To develop a policy for testing and treatment, we determined the prevalence of and risk factors for chlamydial infection in women in a New York City jail. Methods. Interviews and cervical cultures for C trachomatis were obtained from 101 consenting female inmates. Results. Positive cultures for C trachomatis were found in 27% of the participants. Mucopurulent cervical discharge and education of 8 years or less were two independent risk factors for infection, but only 63% of the infected women had one or both of these factors. If pelvic tenderness were considered as a third factor, an additional 7% of the infected women would have been identified. Conclusions. The prevalence of chlamydial infection in this population was as high as that in populations for which presumptive treatment is recommended. Although the optimal policy for detection and treatment of chlamydial infection may vary depending on practical considerations, we suggest that women entering correctional facilities should be screened or offered presumptive therapy for C trachomatis infection.

Suggested Citation

  • Holmes, M.D. & Safyer, S.M. & Bickell, N.A. & Vermund, S.H. & Hanff, P.A. & Phillips, R.S., 1993. "Chlamydial cervical infection in jailed women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(4), pages 551-555.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:4:551-555_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:4:551-555_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.