IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199383121721-1725_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiethnic variations in the pregnancy outcomes of military dependents

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander, G.R.
  • Baruffi, G.
  • Mor, J.M.
  • Kieffer, E.C.
  • Hulsey, T.C.

Abstract

Objectives. We examined the pregnancy outcomes of three ethnic groups: African-American Blacks, non-Hispanic Whites, and Filipinos. In an attempt to reduce ethnic dissimilarities in parental employment and access to health care, this investigation compared the single-live-birth outcomes of married, adult women who resided in the state of Hawaii and who indicated that their spouse was on active-duty status in the US military. Methods. The data for this study were obtained from the 1979-1989 Hawaii vital-record file that provides linked live birth-infant death information. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for the independent effects of maternal factors on low birthweight and neonatal mortality. Results. Significant differences in maternal age, maternal education, paternal education, parity, hospital of delivery, and use of prenatal care were observed among the ethnic groups. The results of a logistic regression analysis of low birthweight indicated significantly higher risks for Filipinos and Blacks compared with Whites. For very low birthweight, only an increased risk for Blacks was observed. No ethnic differences in neonatal mortality were found. Conclusions. This investigation revealed more comparable infant mortality experiences among the ethnic groups in spite of persistent birthweight differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander, G.R. & Baruffi, G. & Mor, J.M. & Kieffer, E.C. & Hulsey, T.C., 1993. "Multiethnic variations in the pregnancy outcomes of military dependents," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(12), pages 1721-1725.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:12:1721-1725_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:12:1721-1725_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.