IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199383101418-1424_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partner notification for control of HIV: Results after 2 years of a statewide program in Utah

Author

Listed:
  • Pavia, A.T.
  • Benyo, M.
  • Niler, L.
  • Risk, I.

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to evaluate the utility of partner notification for control of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and to identify subgroups in which it may be most effective. Methods. All persons reported to be HIV-positive during a 2-year period were interviewed. Outcome measures included proportion of index patients cooperating; number of partners named, located, counseled and tested; number of persons newly testing positive; and costs. Results. Of 308 index patients, 244 (79%) cooperated. They named 890 partners; 499 (70%) of in-state partners were located. Of these, 154 (24%) had previously tested HIV-positive. Of 279 partners tested for the first time, 39 (14%) were HIV-positive. Injecting drug users were significantly more likely to cooperate than persons in other risk groups (93% vs 76%) and named more partners (median 4 vs 1). Women and persons choosing confidential testing were more likely to cooperate and named more partners. The estimated cost of the program was $62 500 per year. Conclusions. Partner notification identified a group with a high seroprevalence of HIV. It was most successful among populations that may be difficult to reach with other interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavia, A.T. & Benyo, M. & Niler, L. & Risk, I., 1993. "Partner notification for control of HIV: Results after 2 years of a statewide program in Utah," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(10), pages 1418-1424.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:10:1418-1424_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:10:1418-1424_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.