IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1992824547-551_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HIV prevalence and risk behavior among injecting drug users who participate in 'low-threshold' methadone programs in Amsterdam

Author

Listed:
  • Hartgers, C.
  • Van den Hoek, A.J.A.R.
  • Krijnen, P.
  • Coutinho, R.A.

Abstract

Introduction. After the onset of the HIV epidemic, the hope arose that the 'harm reduction' approach of the Amsterdam 'low-threshold' methadone programs would have a function in controlling the spread of HIV among injecting drug users (IDUs). Methods. To find evidence for this assumption, 386 IDUs participating in an HIV study between 1985 and 1989 were studied. Long-term regular participants in low-threshold methadone programs were compared with short-term and/or irregular participants. Results. Controlling for possible confounders, long-term regular participants had a slightly increased but not statistically significant risk of being HIV infected. With regard to current drug use, they injected daily and shared needles as often as did short-term and/or irregular participants. Conclusions. The results suggest that the Amsterdam low-threshold methadone programs fail to diminish HIV risk behavior. If these programs want to have a positive effect on the spread of HIV, expansion of existing HIV prevention efforts, an increase in the daily methadone dose level, and measures to enforce regular attendance may be required.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartgers, C. & Van den Hoek, A.J.A.R. & Krijnen, P. & Coutinho, R.A., 1992. "HIV prevalence and risk behavior among injecting drug users who participate in 'low-threshold' methadone programs in Amsterdam," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(4), pages 547-551.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:4:547-551_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:4:547-551_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.