IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1992823391-394_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low birth weight in relation to multiple induced abortions

Author

Listed:
  • Mandelson, M.T.
  • Maden, C.B.
  • Daling, J.R.

Abstract

Background. Most studies report that a single induced abortion does not increase risk for delivering a low birth weight infant in a subsequent pregnancy. However, the effect of multiple abortions has not been adequately evaluated. Methods. This relationship was studied in 6541 White women who delivered their first child between 1984 and 1987. We compared the frequencies of low birth weight (less than 2500 g) among infants born to 1999 women without prior induced abortion and 1999 women with one abortion with the frequencies of low birth weight among infants born to women with two (n = 1850), three (n = 520), and four or more (n = 173) prior induced abortions. Results. After adjustment for confounding variables, we found no linear relationship in risk of low birth weight among women with one (relative risk [RR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9-1.5), two (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.0), three (RR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.8-1.9), or four or more (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.9-2.9) prior induced abortions. Conclusions. These findings confirm earlier reports of little or no evidence of harmful effects on birth weight by one or by two or more induced abortions. We further report that risk is not significantly elevated even in women with three, four, or more prior terminations of pregnancy when compared with women with one or two abortions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mandelson, M.T. & Maden, C.B. & Daling, J.R., 1992. "Low birth weight in relation to multiple induced abortions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(3), pages 391-394.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:3:391-394_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:3:391-394_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.