IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1992822195-198_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonclinical factors associated with surgery received for treatment of early-stage breast cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Satariano, E.R.
  • Swanson, G.M.
  • Moll, P.P.

Abstract

Background. Women diagnosed with early breast cancer have had the opportunity to receive breast-conserving surgical treatment, which reduces the physical and psychological morbidity heretofore associated with breast removal. Methods. Nonclinical factors associated with women receiving partial mastectomies with radiation (P+R) compared with modified radical mastectomies without radiation (MOR) were examined in 2238 Black and White women diagnosed, in 1985 through 1987, with early-stage breast cancer in the metropolitan Detroit area. Results. Age at diagnosis and size of hospital were the strongest predictors of type of surgery received, with younger women (less than 55 years of age) and women treated in larger hospitals (more than 500 beds) more than twice as likely to receive P+R. Stratifying on race, age at diagnosis remained the strongest predictor for White women, followed by hospital size. Among Black women, hospital size was more strongly associated with surgery received than was age. Conclusions. Younger women and women undergoing treatment at large hospitals are more likely to receive the breast-conserving P+R. Black women treated in small hospitals appear to be particularly unlikely to receive P+R.

Suggested Citation

  • Satariano, E.R. & Swanson, G.M. & Moll, P.P., 1992. "Nonclinical factors associated with surgery received for treatment of early-stage breast cancer," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(2), pages 195-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:2:195-198_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:2:195-198_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.