IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199282174-78_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of using mental health services: Implications of using alternative definitions

Author

Listed:
  • Mechanic, D.
  • Angel, R.J.
  • Davies, L.

Abstract

Background. Studies using varying definitions of mental health visits result in widely divergent estimates. This analysis examines the stability of a predictive model using three varying definitions based on provider type, diagnosis, psychotherapy, and psychotropic medication use. Methods. Interview and questionnaire data and claims records from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment are used to test these models among 3138 enrollees. Results. Estimates of visits, and factors associated with them, are highly sensitive to definitions. Depression was the only symptom/life situation variable, and education the only sociodemographic measure, predictive across all three models. Risk indicators such as suicide thoughts and drinking problems were only significant for the traditional (mental health specialty) model. While patients within the traditional model definition were significantly younger than other enrollees, those within the model using the most expansive definition were significantly older. Varying the definition also led to different results in respect to experimental manipulations, geographic sites, and some specific types of comorbidity. Conclusions. A reasonable definition, consistent with medical standards, requires, at least, a mental health diagnostic judgment and some form of psychotherapeutic or drug treatment. Studies of the content of mental health care are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mechanic, D. & Angel, R.J. & Davies, L., 1992. "Correlates of using mental health services: Implications of using alternative definitions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(1), pages 74-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:1:74-78_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Justin S. White & Debra A. Draper, 2004. "Review of the Literature on Administration and Policy Development for Medicaid Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services," Mathematica Policy Research Reports cb9cbb5353044ba582b707ecb, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:4537 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:1:74-78_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.