IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199282121621-1625_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of obesity in young Black and White women: The CARDIA study

Author

Listed:
  • Burke, G.L.
  • Savage, P.J.
  • Manolio, T.A.
  • Sprafka, J.M.
  • Wagenknecht, L.E.
  • Sidney, S.
  • Perkins, L.L.
  • Liu, K.
  • Jacobs Jr., D.R.

Abstract

Objectives. Although differences in obesity between Blacks and Whites are well documented in adult women, less information is available on potential correlates of these differences, especially in young adults. Methods. The association between behavioral and demographic factors and body size was assessed in 2801 Black and White women aged 18 to 30 years. Results. Black women had significantly higher age-adjusted mean body mass index and subscapular skinfold thickness than did White women. Obesity had different associations with age and education across racial groups. A positive relationship between age and obesity was seen in Black women but not in White women, whereas a negative association between education and body size was noted only in White women. Potential contributing factors to the increased prevalence of obesity in Black women include a more sedentary lifestyle, higher energy intake, earlier menarche, and earlier age at first childbirth. Conclusions. The difference in obesity across race could not be explained completely by these factors, since within virtually all strata, Black women had higher body mass indexes. Further investigation is needed to develop interventional strategies to prevent or reduce excess levels of obesity in Black women.

Suggested Citation

  • Burke, G.L. & Savage, P.J. & Manolio, T.A. & Sprafka, J.M. & Wagenknecht, L.E. & Sidney, S. & Perkins, L.L. & Liu, K. & Jacobs Jr., D.R., 1992. "Correlates of obesity in young Black and White women: The CARDIA study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(12), pages 1621-1625.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:12:1621-1625_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:12:1621-1625_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.