IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199282111506-1512_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: A method to examine potential biases

Author

Listed:
  • Biggar, R.J.
  • Melbye, M.

Abstract

Objectives. Low response rates to voluntary surveys raise questions about how representative the responses are. We compared the behavior and attitudes of responders, willing and reluctant, and nonresponders to anonymous questionnaires about behaviors that might expose participants to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 1080 Danish adults 18 through 59 years including explicit questions about sexual acts and illegal drug use. Identical questionnaires were sent to 3600 other Danes, similarly chosen; packets sent to these persons included cards to be returned separately informing us that they had responded. Questionnaires were sent twice more to nonresponders, who, if they then responded, were considered reluctant responders. One hundred nonresponders were telephoned and asked why they had refused to respond. Results. Enclosing return cards did not affect initial response rate, but prompting boosted replies from 52% to 73%. However, behaviors were generally similar among initial and reluctant responders. One third of nonresponders agreed to respond if we wished (total potential response: 82%). In general, the reasons for nonresponse did not suggest that the lifestyles of nonresponders placed them at risk for HIV infection. Conclusions. This method provides a simple, inexpensive approach to improving response rates and learning about the biases of reluctant responders and nonresponders.

Suggested Citation

  • Biggar, R.J. & Melbye, M., 1992. "Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: A method to examine potential biases," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(11), pages 1506-1512.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:11:1506-1512_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:11:1506-1512_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.