IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199282101365-1369_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neonatal tetanus in rural Bangladesh: Risk factors and toxoid efficacy

Author

Listed:
  • Hlady, W.G.
  • Bennett, J.V.
  • Samadi, A.R.
  • Begum, J.
  • Hafez, A.
  • Tarafdar, A.I.
  • Boring, J.R.

Abstract

Objectives. Tetanus continues to be a leading cause of neonatal death in Bangladesh as in other developing countries, yet little is known about risk factors or the efficacy of tetanus toxoid in this setting. Methods. In May 1990, mothers of 6148 infants born alive between March 15, 1989, and March 14, 1990, in 30 rural unions of Rajshahi Division in Bangladesh were interviewed. Three surviving controls for each neonatal tetanus death were matched for sex, residence, and date of birth. Results. Of 330 neonatal deaths, 112 met the case definition for tetanus. Risk was increased with a history of neonatal tetanus in a previous child, application of coconut oil to the vagina, and use of multiple ties on the umbilical cord. Risk was reduced by the birth attendant washing hands and using a cleaned cord-cutting tool. Risk was not reduced by a maternal history of two doses of tetanus toxoid (TT2), although estimated efficacy of TT2 was 45% (95% confidence interval = 16% to 64%). Subsequent to the survey, a reference laboratory reported no potency in three consecutive lots of tetanus vaccine from the production laboratory in Bangladesh. Conclusions. These findings identify high-risk mothers, stress the importance of washing hands and cleaning the cord-cutting tool, and demand improved quality control of tetanus vaccine production.

Suggested Citation

  • Hlady, W.G. & Bennett, J.V. & Samadi, A.R. & Begum, J. & Hafez, A. & Tarafdar, A.I. & Boring, J.R., 1992. "Neonatal tetanus in rural Bangladesh: Risk factors and toxoid efficacy," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(10), pages 1365-1369.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:10:1365-1369_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1992:82:10:1365-1369_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.