IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19918191195-1197_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Malnutrition in elderly ambulatory medical patients

Author

Listed:
  • Manson, A.
  • Shea, S.

Abstract

Elderly ambulatory persons may be especially susceptible to malnutrition, particularly those who are poor and socially isolated or have commorbid chronic medical diseases. We found that 98 of 2,986 persons age 60 years or older attending a hospital-based medical practice between 1979 and 1989 weighed less than 45.4 kg (100 lbs). All but 1 of these subjects met criteria for malnutrition as judged against age-specific norms for weight. Thus the prevalence of malnutrition in this sample was 3.25% (95% CI 2.61, 3.89%). Interviews and physical examinations of a subsample (n = 16) revealed that all 16 subjects either met anthropometric-based criteria for malnutrition or were being treated for malnutrition. Of the 98 subjects who weighted less than 45.4 kg, 62 (63.3%; 95% CI 53.8, 72.8%) had comorbid conditions that could have contributed to malnutrition. Physicians did not record a diagnosis of malnutrition or weight loss in 47.9% of subjects (95% CI 38.0, 57.8%) and did not prescribe a nutrition supplement for 76.5% of subjects (95% CI 68.1, 84.9%). Subjects treated with nutrition supplement were more likely to have cancer. These findings suggest that malnutrition, both with and without concomitant major comorbid disease, is releatively frequent among elderly ambulatory patients and that a specific nutritional diagnosis is not made in many cases. We suggest that weight under 45.4 kg in an elderly person is a useful criterion for identifying elderly patients at nutritional risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Manson, A. & Shea, S., 1991. "Malnutrition in elderly ambulatory medical patients," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(9), pages 1195-1197.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:9:1195-1197_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:9:1195-1197_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.