IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19918191121-1126_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is coronary-care-unit admission restricted for elderly patients? A multicenter study

Author

Listed:
  • Fleming, C.
  • D'Agostino, R.B.
  • Selker, H.P.

Abstract

Background. To investigate whether elderly patients are more likely to experience restricted access to high technology medical care, we examined the impact of age on the likelihood of coronary care unit (CCU) admission for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods. As part of a prospective investigation of emergency room triage for patients with suspected cardiac ischemia, we studied 4223 patients presenting to six hospitals. Because CCU admission is the accepted standard of care for acute infarction, we defined nonadmission to the CCU as a restriction of access to care. We used a logistic regression model to control for gender, hospital, and CCU occupancy at the time of admission and examined the relationship between age and CCU nonadmission. Results. Patients 75 years or older with acute myocardial infarction were 2.5 times more likely not to be admitted to the CCU than younger patients (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.64, 3.85). Coronary unit admission was restricted even when the physician's admitting diagnosis was ''myocardial infarction'' (RR 7.1, 95% CI 2.1, 25.0) or ''rule-out myocardial infarction'' (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 2.1). Observed differences in clinical presentation or severity of illness between older and younger patients did not account for these findings. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that physicians may intentionally restrict access to coronary care for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Suggested Citation

  • Fleming, C. & D'Agostino, R.B. & Selker, H.P., 1991. "Is coronary-care-unit admission restricted for elderly patients? A multicenter study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(9), pages 1121-1126.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:9:1121-1126_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:9:1121-1126_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.