IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1991817885-891_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cervical cancer screening: Who is not screened and why?

Author

Listed:
  • Harlan, L.C.
  • Bernstein, A.B.
  • Kessler, L.G.

Abstract

Background: The decline in death rates from cervical cancer in the United States has been widely attributed to the use of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears for early detection of cervical cancer. Methods: Pap smear screening rates, beliefs about appropriate screening intervals and factors affecting screening were examined using 1987 National Health Interview Survey data. Results: Results indicate that through age 69, Blacks are screened at similar or higher rates than Whites. Hispanics, particularly those speaking only or mostly Spanish, are least likely to have received a Pap smear within the last three years. Of women who had never heard of or never had a Pap smear, nearly 80 percent reported contact with a medical practitioner in the past two years, while more than 90 percent reported a contact in the past five years. Overall, the most frequently reported reason for not having a recent Pap smear was procrastinating or not believing it was necessary. Conclusions: Thus, in developing screening programs, Hispanics, particularly Spanish speakers, must be targeted. In addition, educational programs should target unscreened women who forego the test due to underestimating its importance, procrastination, or because their medical care provider did not suggest the procedure. Women must be intensively educated that Pap smears should be scheduled routinely to detect asymptomatic cervical cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Harlan, L.C. & Bernstein, A.B. & Kessler, L.G., 1991. "Cervical cancer screening: Who is not screened and why?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(7), pages 885-891.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:7:885-891_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Ted McDonald & Jeremiah Neily, 2007. "Immigration, Ethnicity and Cancer in U.S. Women," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 206, McMaster University.
    2. Clairice T. Veit, 1999. "Motivating Mammography Adherence in Elderly Latinas," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(4), pages 448-465, October.
    3. Sabates, Ricardo & Feinstein, Leon, 2006. "The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: The case of cervical screening in Britain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 2998-3010, June.
    4. Saroj Fleming & Nicholas H Schluterman & J Katthleen Tracy & Sarah M Temkin, 2014. "Black and White Women in Maryland Receive Different Treatment for Cervical Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-8, August.
    5. Markovic, Milica & Kesic, Vesna & Topic, Lidija & Matejic, Bojana, 2005. "Barriers to cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study with women in Serbia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2528-2535, December.
    6. James Ted McDonald & Steven Kennedy, 2005. "Ethnicity, Immigration and Cancer Screening: Evidence for Canadian Women," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 145, McMaster University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:7:885-891_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.