IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1991813328-334_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intake of tapwater and total water by pregnant and lactating women

Author

Listed:
  • Ershow, A.G.
  • Brown, L.M.
  • Cantor, K.P.

Abstract

Background. Despite theoretically higher requirements for water due to physiologic demands of pregnancy and lactation, little is known of actual ranges of intake in pregnant and lactating women. Methods. Population-based estimates of total water and tapwater intake in women of reproductive age were derived using data from the 1977-78 USDA Nationwide Food Consumption Survey. Three-day average intakes were calculated for 188 pregnant women, 77 lactating women, and 6,201 non-pregnant, non-lactating control women. Results. Total water intake (mean ± SD) was 1,940 ± 686 g/day (median 1,835) for control women, 2,076 ± 743 g/day (median 1,928) for pregnant women and 2,242 ± 658 g/day (median 2,164) for lactating women. Tapwater intake was 1,157 ± 635 g/day (median 1,065) for control women, 1,189 ± 699 g/day (median 1,063) for pregnant women, and 1,310 ± 591 g/day (median 1,330) for lactating women. Total water intake was equal to or greater than 3,000 g/day among 7 percent of control women, 11 percent of pregnant women, and 13 percent of lactating women. Tapwater intake was equal to or greater than 2,000 g/day among 10 percent of control women, 15 percent of pregnant women, and 8 percent of lactating women. Conclusions. These results should be useful in estimating amounts of nutrients and toxic substances that women of reproductive age obtain through the water supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Ershow, A.G. & Brown, L.M. & Cantor, K.P., 1991. "Intake of tapwater and total water by pregnant and lactating women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(3), pages 328-334.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:3:328-334_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harshit Mishra & Subhankar Karmakar & Rakesh Kumar & Jitendra Singh, 2017. "A Framework for Assessing Uncertainty Associated with Human Health Risks from MSW Landfill Leachate Contamination," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(7), pages 1237-1255, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:3:328-334_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.