IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199181138-42_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics of Italian physicians in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Liberati, A.
  • Apolone, G.
  • Nicolucci, A.
  • Confalonieri, C.
  • Fossati, R.
  • Grilli, R.
  • Torri, V.
  • Masconi, P.
  • Alexanian, A.

Abstract

The influences of Italian physicans' attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics on medical decision making is examined in the case of surgical treatment of early breast cancer. Responses to a mail survey of 657 physicians from different specialities were analyzed comparing doctors recommending a radical procedure (9%) to those perferring a conservative procedure for younger patients only (25%), and those considering conservative surgery the treatment of choice regardless of patients' age (66%). The findings suggest that the likelihood of physicians' preferring a conservative procedure is influenced by their specialty and the extent to which they feel that a patient should have a role in the treatment decision more than by differences in the beliefs of treatment outcomes. Only preferences of the small group indicating radical surgery as the sole admissible treatment can be accounted for by ignorance or distrust of results of recent trials. These findings suggest that other than scientific factors guide many doctors in their decision making; they may help to explain why the diffusion of research results into clinical practice is often disappointingly slow.

Suggested Citation

  • Liberati, A. & Apolone, G. & Nicolucci, A. & Confalonieri, C. & Fossati, R. & Grilli, R. & Torri, V. & Masconi, P. & Alexanian, A., 1991. "The role of attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics of Italian physicians in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(1), pages 38-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:1:38-42_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1991:81:1:38-42_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.