IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199080111349-1353_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical and psychosocial factors predictive of psychotropic drug use in elderly patients

Author

Listed:
  • Ried, L.D.
  • Christensen, D.B.
  • Stergachis, A.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate medical and psychosocial factors that may be used to identify patients at risk of psychotropic drug use. Population-based surveys were completed by 278 elderly health maintenance organization (HMO) patients in August 1984. Physical and mental health status and social support were measured in the survey. Automated prescription records from the year prior to and the year after the survey were linked to data from the survey. Patients received 737 prescriptions for psychotropic drugs during the two-year period under study. Doxepin (20.2 percent), flurazepam (15.2 percent), and diazepam (14.8 percent) were dispensed most frequently. Nearly 30 percent of the patients received a prescription for at least one psychotropic drug during the two-year period, and 14 percent received at least one prescription during both years. Three significant predictors of subsequent psychotropic drug use were: prior use (odds ratio = 17.2, 95% CI = 6.25, 47.33), the number of physical impairments (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.84), and the respondent's rating on the Alameda Health Scale (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.99, 2.75). Patient's self-reported mental health status and sociodemographic characteristics were not significant predictors of subsequent use.

Suggested Citation

  • Ried, L.D. & Christensen, D.B. & Stergachis, A., 1990. "Medical and psychosocial factors predictive of psychotropic drug use in elderly patients," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 80(11), pages 1349-1353.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1990:80:11:1349-1353_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1990:80:11:1349-1353_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.