IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/198979121603-1607_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The reliability of health risk appraisals: A field trial of four instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, K.W.
  • McKinlay, S.M.
  • McKinlay, J.B.

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to evaluate the reliability of four widely used health risk appraisals (HRAs). A total of 338 randomly selected adults aged 25 to 65 years residing in the Boston metropolitan area completed an HRA on two occasions seven to 12 weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed by comparing self-reported baseline risk scores to follow-up scores for heart attack risk and selected coronary heart disease risk factor. Respondents generally gave consistent reports for family history, cigarette smoking, and relative weight (test-retest r > .75), but self-reported scores for physiologic status (blood pressure and cholesterol) and lifestile (diet, physical activity, and stress) were much less stable. Coefficients for heart attack risk and appraised age ranged from .43 to .87 for the four HRAs. The reliabilities of two self-scored instruments were greatly reduced by mathematical errors made by respondents when computing their heart attack risk scores. These results were not affected by the length of the follow up period (seven to 12 weeks).

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, K.W. & McKinlay, S.M. & McKinlay, J.B., 1989. "The reliability of health risk appraisals: A field trial of four instruments," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 79(12), pages 1603-1607.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1989:79:12:1603-1607_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1989:79:12:1603-1607_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.