IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1988785516-519_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Past and present preferred prescribing practices of hormone replacement therapy among Los Angeles gynecologists: Possible implications for public health

Author

Listed:
  • Ross, R.K.
  • Paganini-Hill, A.
  • Roy, S.
  • Chao, A.
  • Henderson, B.E.

Abstract

Usual prescribing strategies of hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal women by Los Angeles area gynecologists, both now and 10 years ago, were investigated by a mail survey. Of the 330 gynecologists who responded, estrogen therapy is currently used as a routine by nearly all (95 per cent), for women both with and without a uterus. Over three-fourths of these physicians favor use of 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen. The estrogen is combined with cyclic progestin therapy, usually 10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, by 86 per cent of gynecologists using estrogen for women with a uterus, and by 47 per cent for women without a uterus. Although conjugated equine estrogens were used widely for both groups of patients 10 years ago, a higher dose generally was preferred. Use of progestin therapy was uncommon (less than 20 per cent) for any postmenopausal patients at that time. Although the most common monthly therapeutic regimen for estrogen/progestin therapy is estrogen for days 1-25 and progestin for days 16-25, there is wide variation in prescribing strategies. We present these findings in the context of the probable effects of estrogen/progestin therapy on various chronic disease outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross, R.K. & Paganini-Hill, A. & Roy, S. & Chao, A. & Henderson, B.E., 1988. "Past and present preferred prescribing practices of hormone replacement therapy among Los Angeles gynecologists: Possible implications for public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(5), pages 516-519.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1988:78:5:516-519_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1988:78:5:516-519_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.