Author
Listed:
- Lange, W.R.
- Snyder, F.R.
- Lozovsky, D.
- Kaistha, V.
- Kaczaniuk, M.A.
- Jaffe, J.H.
- Primm, B.J.
- Brown, L.
- Luney, C.M.
- Poe, T.
- Payte, J.T.
- Hall, S.W.
- Crowley, T.J.
- Brewster, J.T.
- Tennant, F.S.
- Clabough, D.
Abstract
Drug abuse treatment programs in six regions of the United States collaborated in a study aimed at monitoring trends in the seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies. The wide disparities in HIV seroprevalence in the face of similarities in drug using behavior have important implications for prevention. In the New York City area (Harlem, Brooklyn), 61 per cen of samples (N = 280) obtained in late 1986 were positive, up from 50 per cent of samples (N = 585) in early 1985. In Baltimore, Maryland, 29 per cent of samples (N = 184) representing 11 programs were positive. In contrast, samples from programs distant from the Northeast corridor had far lower rates: Denver, Colorado 5 per cent (N = 100); San Antonio, Texas 2 per cent (N = 106); Southern California, 1.5 per cent (N = 413); and Tampa, Florida, 0 per cent (N = 102). Contrary to expectations, there was no corresponding difference in reported lifetime needle sharing experiences, which ranged from 70 per cent in New York to 99 per cent in San Antonio. HIV seropositivity was associated only with geographic location and ethnicity; however, because needle sharing is practiced by parenteral drug abusers in areas where seroprevalence is still relatively low, these areas are potentially vulnerable to the same catastrophic spread seen in the Northeast. A window of opportunity exists where prompt, vigorous, and aggressive efforts at prevention could have major impact.
Suggested Citation
Lange, W.R. & Snyder, F.R. & Lozovsky, D. & Kaistha, V. & Kaczaniuk, M.A. & Jaffe, J.H. & Primm, B.J. & Brown, L. & Luney, C.M. & Poe, T. & Payte, J.T. & Hall, S.W. & Crowley, T.J. & Brewster, J.T. & , 1988.
"Geographic distribution of human immunodeficiency virus markers in parenteral drug abusers,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(4), pages 443-446.
Handle:
RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1988:78:4:443-446_5
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1988:78:4:443-446_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.