IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1986768980-985_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delivery type and neonatal mortality among 10,749 breeches

Author

Listed:
  • Fortney, J.A.
  • Higgins, J.E.
  • Kennedy, K.I.
  • Laufe, L.E.
  • Wilkens, L.

Abstract

Data on 10,749 breech presentations were analyzed for the effect of delivery type on neonatal mortality. Most of the data are from developing countries, and most of the hospitals have higher mortality than is found in Europe or the United States. The simultaneous effect of type of hospital where the delivery occurred, type of breech, birthweight, and parity were examined. The benefit of cesarean delivery was greater for nulliparae than multiparae, greater for footlings than for frank or complete breeches, and greater for larger babies than smaller ones. This last finding probably reflects the quality of neonatal care in developing country hospitals rather than the value of cesarean section. Maternal mortality and morbidity was higher among women delivered abdominally than among those delivered vaginally.

Suggested Citation

  • Fortney, J.A. & Higgins, J.E. & Kennedy, K.I. & Laufe, L.E. & Wilkens, L., 1986. "Delivery type and neonatal mortality among 10,749 breeches," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 76(8), pages 980-985.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1986:76:8:980-985_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1986:76:8:980-985_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.