IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1986766667-669_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal marijuana use and neonatal outcome: Uncertainty posed by self-reports

Author

Listed:
  • Hingson, R.
  • Zuckerman, B.
  • Amaro, H.
  • Frank, D.A.
  • Kayne, H.
  • Sorenson, J.R.
  • Mitchell, J.
  • Parker, S.
  • Morelock, S.
  • Timperi, R.

Abstract

To assess the validity of self-reported marijuana use during pregnancy, this study randomly allocated pregnant women into a group who were told their urine would be tested for marijuana, alcohol, and other drugs and another group not so tested. Women told they would be tested reported more marijuana use during pregnancy than did untested women. Moreover, urine assays identified more women who used marijuana during pregnancy than were willing to admit it in the interview even after being told their urine would be tested. No differences in reported drinking or cigarette smoking during pregnancy were found between tested and untested women.

Suggested Citation

  • Hingson, R. & Zuckerman, B. & Amaro, H. & Frank, D.A. & Kayne, H. & Sorenson, J.R. & Mitchell, J. & Parker, S. & Morelock, S. & Timperi, R., 1986. "Maternal marijuana use and neonatal outcome: Uncertainty posed by self-reports," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 76(6), pages 667-669.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1986:76:6:667-669_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1986:76:6:667-669_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.