IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/198575101204-1208_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epidemiologic evaluation of screening for risk factors: Application to genetic screening

Author

Listed:
  • Khoury, M.J.
  • Newill, C.A.
  • Chase, G.A.

Abstract

To assess the usefulness of screening for risk factors, we derived arithmetic relationships between screening parameters (sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value PPV) and risk factor frequency, disease frequency and relative risk. We evaluated these relationships in the special case of genetic markers and disease susceptibility. It can be shown that even in the face of very large relative risks, sensitivity and positive predictive value are affected by the relative magnitude of disease and genetic marker frequences. When the genetic marker is less frequent than the disease, PPV increases with increasing relative risk but sensitivity remains low. When the genetic marker is more frequent than the disease, sensitivity increases with increasing relative risk but PPV remains low. When marker and disease frequencies are equal, both PPV and sensitivity increase with increasing relative risks, but very high relative risks (> 100) have to be obtained for rare diseases. Depending on the goals of the screening program, these relationships can be used to predict the relative magnitudes of false positives (low PPV) and false negatives (low sensitivity). This approach can be generalized to evaluate nongenetic risk factors in screening programs as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Khoury, M.J. & Newill, C.A. & Chase, G.A., 1985. "Epidemiologic evaluation of screening for risk factors: Application to genetic screening," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 75(10), pages 1204-1208.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1985:75:10:1204-1208_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1985:75:10:1204-1208_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.