IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1984745468-472_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Edgecombe county (NC) high blood pressure control program: II. Barriers to the use of medical care among hypertensives

Author

Listed:
  • James, S.A.
  • Wagner, E.H.
  • Strogatz, D.S.
  • Beresford, S.A.
  • Kleinbaum, D.G.
  • Williams, C.A.
  • Cutchin, L.M.
  • Ibrahim, M.A.

Abstract

As the initial step in a five-year project to improve control of high blood pressure in Edgecombe County, North Carolina, a survey was conducted in 1980 to determine the prevalence of hypertension and to identify factors which might constitute barriers to the use of medical care by hypertensives. This report summarizes the findings for the 539 hypertensives identified through the baseline survey. In general, Black hypertensives reported more access problems than Whites. Within race, however, males and females differed very little on selected measures of potential access to medical care. Among women, lower scores on potential access were strongly associated with being untreated, whereas for men, concerns about the safety of anti-hypertensive drug therapy were associated with being unaware. On a summary measure of the actual use of medical care in response to symptoms, both male and female treated hypertensives scored higher than their untreated counterparts. The implications of these and other findings for community-based blood pressure control activities are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • James, S.A. & Wagner, E.H. & Strogatz, D.S. & Beresford, S.A. & Kleinbaum, D.G. & Williams, C.A. & Cutchin, L.M. & Ibrahim, M.A., 1984. "The Edgecombe county (NC) high blood pressure control program: II. Barriers to the use of medical care among hypertensives," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(5), pages 468-472.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:5:468-472_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:5:468-472_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.