IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/198474101093-1097_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The usefulness of the Denver developmental screening test to predict kindergarten problems in a general community population

Author

Listed:
  • Cadman, D.
  • Chambers, L.W.
  • Walter, S.D.
  • Feldman, W.
  • Smith, K.
  • Ferguson, R.

Abstract

The Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) was administered to 2,569 children five to seven months prior to starting kindergarten in September 1980 in a geographically well-defined community. The test was administered by trained public health nurses. At the end of the 1980-1981 school year, all 163 kindergarten teachers in the area completed a rating form for each child in their class. The rating form determined global ratings of: 1) learning abilities; 2) classroom behavior; 3) amount of special attention required ; and 4) referrals to special education services outside the classroom. The specificity of the DDST in predicting kindergarten teacher ratings was 99 per cent for all areas. Test sensitivity varied from 5 per cent to 10 per cent in detecting problems in the four areas. The predictive values of a positive test varied from 31 per cent for behavior problems to 62 per cent for extra attention required in the classroom. Negative test predictive values varied from 79 per cent to 93 per cent. These results based on kindergarten teacher ratings suggest that, because of the low sensitivity and modest predictive value, the DDST may be relatively inefficient to use in a school entry screening program in a general community population of children.

Suggested Citation

  • Cadman, D. & Chambers, L.W. & Walter, S.D. & Feldman, W. & Smith, K. & Ferguson, R., 1984. "The usefulness of the Denver developmental screening test to predict kindergarten problems in a general community population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(10), pages 1093-1097.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:10:1093-1097_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fiona Sim & Lucy Thompson & Louise Marryat & Nitish Ramparsad & Philip Wilson, 2019. "Predictive validity of preschool screening tools for language and behavioural difficulties: A PRISMA systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-31, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:10:1093-1097_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.