IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/198474101086-1092_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

WIC participation and preganancy outcomes: Masschusetts statewide evaluation project

Author

Listed:
  • Kotelchuck, M.
  • Schwartz, J.B.
  • Anderka, M.T.
  • Finison, K.S.

Abstract

The effects of WIC prenatal participation were examined using data from the Massachusetts Birth and Death Registry. The birth outcomes of 4,126 pregnant women who participated in the WIC program and gave birth in 1978 were compared to those of 4,126 women individually matched on maternal age, race, parity, education, and marital status who did not participate in WIC. WIC prenatal participants are at greater diagnostic risk for poor pregnancy outcomes compared to all women in the same community. WIC participation is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes, including, a decrease in low birthweight (LBW) incidence (6.9 per cent vs 8.7 per cent) and neonatal mortality (12 vs 35 deaths), an increase in gestational age (40.0 vs 39.7 weeks), and a reduction in adequate prenatal care (3.8 per cent vs 7.0 per cent). Stratification by demographic subpopulations indicates that subpopulations at higher risk (teenage, unmarried, and Hispanic origin women) have more enhanced pregnancy outcomes associated with WIC participation. Stratification by duration of participation indicates that increased participation is associated with enhanced pregnancy outcomes. While these findings suggest that birth outcome differences are a function of WIC participation, other factors which might distinguish between the two groups could also serve as the basis for alternative explanations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotelchuck, M. & Schwartz, J.B. & Anderka, M.T. & Finison, K.S., 1984. "WIC participation and preganancy outcomes: Masschusetts statewide evaluation project," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(10), pages 1086-1092.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:10:1086-1092_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sharon L. Caudle & Kathryn E. Newcomer, 1986. "Grant Allocation Decision Rules," Evaluation Review, , vol. 10(6), pages 860-879, December.
    2. Ke Pan & Leslie Beitsch & Elaina Gonsoroski & Samendra P. Sherchan & Christopher K. Uejio & Maureen Y. Lichtveld & Emily W. Harville, 2021. "Effects of Hurricane Michael on Access to Care for Pregnant Women and Associated Pregnancy Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:10:1086-1092_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.