IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1983738850-855_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Seattle evaluation of computerized drug profiles: Effects on prescribing practices and resource use

Author

Listed:
  • Koepsell, T.D.
  • Gurtel, A.L.
  • Diehr, P.H.
  • Temkin, N.R.
  • Helfand, K.H.
  • Gleser, M.A.
  • Tompkins, R.K.

Abstract

Since 1979, all outpatient pharmacy transactions at the US Public Health Service Hospital in Seattle have been captured in a computer system which generates a profile of each patient's active and previously used drugs. The authors conducted a controlled trial in which patients were allocated to profile or no-profile groups while the computer continued to collect data on everyone. In all, 41,572 clinic visits made by 6,186 patients were studied. The incidence of preventable drug-drug interactions and redundancies was very low and was unaffected by profiles. For unclear reasons, prescription of two interacting drugs on the same visit was significantly more common for patients with profiles. The duration of drug-drug interaction episodes was significantly shorter for profile group patients, perhaps due to earlier detection of the error on subsequent visits. Profiles had no effect on prescribing volume or coordination of drug refill and visit schedules, but profile group patients made about 5% fewer clinic visits than those in the no-profile group. In this setting, it appears that the prescribing of interacting or redundant drugs is more often due to inadequate provider knowledge than to inaccessible patient-specific drug data. Prevention of such errors would thus require a more active educational or monitoring program.

Suggested Citation

  • Koepsell, T.D. & Gurtel, A.L. & Diehr, P.H. & Temkin, N.R. & Helfand, K.H. & Gleser, M.A. & Tompkins, R.K., 1983. "The Seattle evaluation of computerized drug profiles: Effects on prescribing practices and resource use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 73(8), pages 850-855.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1983:73:8:850-855_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1983:73:8:850-855_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.