IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1983736666-671_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of the primary care roles of office-based physicians

Author

Listed:
  • Weiner, J.P.
  • Starfield, B.H.

Abstract

The Baltimore City Primary Care Study examined the role of the urban office-based physician in the delivery of primary care. During the course of the study, questionnaires were completed by over 90 per cent of licensed physicians in the city, and data were collected from a sample of 16,000 patients. The study developed and assessed three approaches for the measurement of primary care. An empirical method was based upon information regarding the following characteristics of each visit: first contact visit, referral visit, specialized care visit, or principal care visit. A normative method was based on an assessment of the degree to which the practice provided care that was comprehensive, longitudinal, acceptable, and family-centered. The third method used physicians' judgements as to the proportion of patients for whom they maintained ongoing responsibility for general medical care. All three methods produced the same categorization of different specialities as providing either primary, intermediate, or speciality care. As a group, primary care physicians included general and family physicians, pediatricians, and general internists. General surgeons and obstetrician/gynecologists have characteristics of both primary care and specialist care. All other physician groups have characteristics of specialists. Any of these methods or a combination of methods can be used to assess the extent to which the practice of a particular physician or group of physicians provide primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiner, J.P. & Starfield, B.H., 1983. "Measurement of the primary care roles of office-based physicians," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 73(6), pages 666-671.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1983:73:6:666-671_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1983:73:6:666-671_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.