IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1982727690-697_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing efficiency in evaluation research: the use of sequential analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Howe, H.L.

Abstract

This paper describes Wald's sequential analysis and briefly reviews the history of its applied use. Two public health applications are presented as examples of how the method helped overcome two common problems associated with evaluation research. In one case, the sequential technique reduced dramatically the workload in an evaluation project where hospital records were being reviewed. In the second case, prompt feedback of data to a breast screening program was facilitated by the sequential method allowing program administrators to refocus their efforts on problem areas before the end of the funding period. On the average, Wald's sequential method results in a savings of 50 per cent in observations as compared to classical sampling procedures. The sample sizes will always terminate with a finite number and will rarely exceed three times the average sample size for any single sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Howe, H.L., 1982. "Increasing efficiency in evaluation research: the use of sequential analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 72(7), pages 690-697.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1982:72:7:690-697_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1982:72:7:690-697_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.