IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1979695505-507_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The medical cost of drug abuse in an inner-city community

Author

Listed:
  • Sixsmith, D.M.
  • Goldman, F.

Abstract

The discharge diagnoses of the patients in this survey represent a wide spectrum of conditions. They are fairly typical of the known complications of drug abuse, especially the infectious conditions. The Harlem Hospital Center had an average daily census of 620.1 patients in general care beds during the year 1975. Based on data from November 1976, drug abusers can be estimated to have absorbed 20,144 days of inpatient care in a community which is high at risk for health problems in general, and which has limited medical resources. At the medicaid reimbursement rate of $215.83, the costs of inpatient treatment for the medical complications of drug abusers were $4.35 million dollars. This suggests that even the most cavalier estimate to date of the medical costs of drug abuse nationally, $494 million, is likely to be severely underestimated. Previous estimates of medical care costs have not taken into account the significant percentage of patients who will require chronic care, either because of associated alcoholism or other conditions; nor have they included the medical care costs of the children of drug abusers. Better methods of identifying and reporting the medical complications of drug abuse are necessary to accurately gauge the cost of drug abuse to society. Further research into current and alternative treatment modalities is also indicated in the hope of achieving earlier intervention or altogether preventing the medical complications of drug abuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Sixsmith, D.M. & Goldman, F., 1979. "The medical cost of drug abuse in an inner-city community," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 69(5), pages 505-507.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1979:69:5:505-507_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1979:69:5:505-507_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.