IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19786810972-976_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rural nurse practitioner: a challenge and a response

Author

Listed:
  • Sullivan, J.A.
  • Dachelet, C.Z.
  • Sultz, H.A.
  • Henry, M.

Abstract

From a cohort of 525 employed nurse practitioners (NPs) who graduated between May 1975 and June 1976, 85 (16%) reported practising in rural areas. While 91% of the rural NPs chose the short-term certificate programs rather than the master's degree for their NP preparation, 47% had already earned a baccalaureate or master's degree prior to NP training. Family NPs comprised the most frequent specialty area chosen, followed by pediatric and adult specialties. Of the 85, 99% were actually providing a broad array of primary care services to clients over a wide age range. Physicians were periodically available on site in about 80% of the practices, by telephone in 97% of the practices, and in 60% of the practices provided additional consultation by record review. Major motivations of the NPs for entering rural practice were to participate in a creative approach to health care delivery (50% of the practice settings were less than five years old), and for the opportunity for role autonomy. Over 95% of these NPs and employers were satisfied with the NP role.

Suggested Citation

  • Sullivan, J.A. & Dachelet, C.Z. & Sultz, H.A. & Henry, M., 1978. "The rural nurse practitioner: a challenge and a response," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 68(10), pages 972-976.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1978:68:10:972-976_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Kane & Marilyn Dean & Marian Solomon, 1979. "An Evaluation of Rural Health Care Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 3(2), pages 139-189, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1978:68:10:972-976_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.