IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19786710970-972_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the syphla chek test for syphilis in a high risk population

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson, M.
  • Portoni, E.

Abstract

The Syphla Chek slide test for syphilis is, in principle, similar to the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) card test for syphilis. The Syphla Chek test employs a stabilized VDRL antigen affixed to a kaolin particle for macroscopic visualization of the serologic reaction when mixed with serum. Of 600 specimens tested, it was found that the Syphla Chek test had a 90.3% exact agreement with the VDRL test in reactive sera and a 96.7% exact agreement with the VDRL in non-reactive sera by qualitative testing. Comparison of the Syphla Chek quantitative results indicate that 94% of the sera tested were within plus or minus 1 dilution of the VDRL. The Syphla Chek slide test for syphilis has 3 major advantages: no heat inactivation is required; it can be read macroscopically; and it can be run in a small laboratory or a physician's office with adequately trained personnel. It is suggested that the test be further studied in comparisons with the RPR and the VDRL. These studies should also include the comparison of quantitative titers in treated patients, since these are of critical importance to the physician when following the course of treatment in the syphilitic patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson, M. & Portoni, E., 1978. "Evaluation of the syphla chek test for syphilis in a high risk population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 67(10), pages 970-972.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1978:67:10:970-972_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1978:67:10:970-972_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.