Author
Listed:
- Chang, A.
- Oglesby, A.C.
- Wallace, H.M.
- Goldstein, H.
- Hexter, A.C.
Abstract
One important finding in this 1974 nationwide study of physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice on child abuse and neglect was a gap between stated attitudes and practice in regard to reporting cases. Almost all pediatricians, radiologists, and 'other' physicians believed that physicians 'should' report cases of child abuse and neglect. But fewer respondents in all three types of physicians believed that physicians 'usually' report such cases, and some could not comment on the practice of reporting. Although the majority of physicians felt that there was an increasing trend in the awareness of child abuse and neglect in their communities, only a minority believe that existing services were adequate and that existing programs were effective. This latter assessment agrees with findings of DeFrancis who in 1972 noted that no state and no community had developed an adequate child protective service program and cited the need for additional cooperation from schools, social agencies, and courts. A more recent study by Nagi also found defects in the present management of child abuse by welfare departments and offered suggestions for improvement of services by welfare departments and caseworkers. Other needs noted in this study were concise and practical references and brochures delineating reporting requirements, additional training programs for physicians, reliable systems of detection and reporting, and clarification of roles and responsibilities of community agencies involved in child abuse and neglect cases. Hopefully, the innovative programs and activities made possible by recent federal legislation in the field of child abuse and neglect will begin to meet these needs.
Suggested Citation
Chang, A. & Oglesby, A.C. & Wallace, H.M. & Goldstein, H. & Hexter, A.C., 1976.
"Child abuse and neglect: Physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 66(12), pages 1199-1201.
Handle:
RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1976:66:12:1199-1201_9
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1976:66:12:1199-1201_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.