IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/197666121197-1198_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the validity of goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in mental health

Author

Listed:
  • Willer, B.
  • Miller, G.

Abstract

Goal attainment ratings by therapists were found to be poor predictors of all outcome measures. On the other hand, clients' ratings of goal attainment were found to correlate significantly with most other measures of treatment outcome. However, clients' goal attainment ratings did not correlate significantly with overall community adjustment which is one of the more important long term outcome measures. As well, the regression analysis indicated that clients' ratings were only slightly predictive of recidivism, and were considerably less powerful predictors than other outcome measures such as length of stay, employment, or community adjustment. These results suggest that goal attainment, as it was measured in the present study, had inadequate concurrent and predictive validity especially when measured by clients' therapists. The validity of goal attainment is vastly improved when clients are used as a source of rating. It is suggested that goal attainment scaling can only remain a viable tool for evaluation of hospital based mental health programs if clients are used as raters and if it is used conjointly with other more traditional measures of treatment outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Willer, B. & Miller, G., 1976. "On the validity of goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in mental health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 66(12), pages 1197-1198.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1976:66:12:1197-1198_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Solomon Cytrynbaum & Yigal Ginath & Joel Birdwell & Lauren Brandt, 1979. "Goal Attainment Scaling," Evaluation Review, , vol. 3(1), pages 5-40, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1976:66:12:1197-1198_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.