IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/197565178-80_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experience with a rubella proficiency testing program in New York State, 1971-1974

Author

Listed:
  • Deibel, R.
  • Clarke, L.M.
  • Millian, S.J.

Abstract

Demonstration of rubella antibody has become, in recent years, one of the tests most frequently requested of virus diagnostic laboratories. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) technique described in 1967 by Stewart et al is sensitive, reproducible, convenient, and economic and commercial availability of diagnostic kits enables laboratories to offer this test without costly facilities for maintenance of cell cultures, preparation of antigen, etc. Recognizing the need for a standardized procedure for the rubella HI test, the United States Public Health Service appointed a committee to evaluate the reproducibility and sensitivity of the various procedures in current use. A report published in 1970 recommended that nonspecific inhibitors be removed by the use of manganese chloride and heparin or, as an 'acceptable alternative' by the calcium chloride dextran sulfate method. Fresh red blood cells from 1 to 3 day old unfed chicks or from geese were chosen as the erythrocytes for the test. In 1971, however, most laboratories in New York State did not follow this procedure, which has not been mandated by federal or state laws or regulations. The majority used the kaolin method for removal of inhibitors; only a few laboratories used the specified erythrocytes. This paper describes the implementation of the New York State rubella proficiency testing program and the experience gained during the first 4 yr of its operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Deibel, R. & Clarke, L.M. & Millian, S.J., 1975. "Experience with a rubella proficiency testing program in New York State, 1971-1974," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 65(1), pages 78-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1975:65:1:78-80_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1975:65:1:78-80_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.