IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1972625689-694_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-prescribed contraceptive education by the unwillingly pregnant

Author

Listed:
  • Thiebaux, H.J.

Abstract

Pregnant young women seeking abortions were asked to evaluate their own personal situations in regard to use and knowledge of contraceptives and learning experiences that would have been helpful and appropriate for them. The study group included 115 women who received counseling at a pregnancy counseling service in the Boston metropolitan area. In addition to the routine background information obtained in the counseling session, a 3-page multiple choice questionnaire was completed by each patient as she waited for her appointment. The findings reported here are of the 80 single women, 70% of the 115. 55% of these patients were between 18 and 21 years old, and the group was predominantly middle-class. 38% had at least some higher education. 50% described their relationship with the conception partner as a continuing one in which marriage was not a consideration. 55% had never discussed contraception with a doctor. The reasons most frequently given for not using contraception were infrequency of sexual relations and dependence on the rhythm method. Regarding the preferred learning method, 48% selected as their 1st or 2nd choice a comprehensive health course with a frank presentation of sexuality and contraceptive information. Personal discussion was the next most frequently chosen method; group discussion with other young people was also on the preferred lists. 35% selected the school at all levels as their choice for the place of learning, with 30% preferring the home.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiebaux, H.J., 1972. "Self-prescribed contraceptive education by the unwillingly pregnant," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 62(5), pages 689-694.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1972:62:5:689-694_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1972:62:5:689-694_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.