IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.75.3.270_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credentialing of diagnostic X-ray technologists: A question of public health impact

Author

Listed:
  • Audet, M.F.
  • Johnson, D.W.

Abstract

This paper presents estimates of the number of diagnostic x-ray examinations performed in the United States, the population dose delivered, the percentage of that dose contributed by credentialed and noncredentialed operators, and one measure of performance: collimation of the x-ray beam. An estimated 82 per cent of medical x-ray examinations are performed by voluntarily certified (ARRT or ARCRT) operators. These procedures contribute 90 per cent of the radiation dose to the population. Data from the Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT program indicate that certified operators collimate the x-ray beam somewhat better than noncertified for chest examinations. They also indicate that differences in collimation practices may be attributed to the type of facility as well as to the credentials of the operators. One-third of the medical x-ray machines are in states presently requiring licensure of operators. It appears from these estimates that instituting operator licensure in the remaining states may reduce population dose by a maximum of one or two per cent.

Suggested Citation

  • Audet, M.F. & Johnson, D.W., 1985. "Credentialing of diagnostic X-ray technologists: A question of public health impact," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 75(3), pages 270-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.75.3.270_9
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.75.3.270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.75.3.270
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.75.3.270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.75.3.270_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.