IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.75.1.67_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control definition in case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy

Author

Listed:
  • Weiss, N.S.
  • Daling, J.R.
  • Chow, W.H.

Abstract

In case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy, the optimal sampling frame for control selection is influenced heavily by the hypothesis being tested. The selection of women completing an intrauterine pregnancy, a common choice for a control group in studies to date, is appropriate only if the hypothesis does not relate to exposures that selectively prevent an intrauterine pregnancy (e.g., use of an intrauterine device (IUD) at the time of conception). Even for other exposures, the selection of such women can yield misleading results if the exposure is related to the likelihood of completion of the intrauterine pregnancy. On the other hand, the selection of nonpregnant women as controls, while permitting a valid evaluation of the risk associated with exposure such as the use of an IUD, can introduce a substantial degree of incomparability between cases and controls with regard to other contraceptive practices and their correlates. Whichever of the two sampling frames that is chosen, an appreciation of these potential biases can lead to ways of tailoring the selection of individual controls to minimize the magnitude of the bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiss, N.S. & Daling, J.R. & Chow, W.H., 1985. "Control definition in case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 75(1), pages 67-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.75.1.67_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.75.1.67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.75.1.67
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.75.1.67?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.75.1.67_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.