Author
Listed:
- Buckingham, R.W.
- Lupu, D.
Abstract
In order to document the implementation of the hospice concept in the United States, 24 hospices, in operation at least one year and serving at least 100 patients, were selected from the National Hospice Organization roster to participate in a survey of organization, staffing, funding, services and population served. All of the hospices offered both home care and bereavement programs but only 41.7 per cent provided an inpatient program. Ten of the hospices were institutionally based, usually in a hospital. Inpatient services were associated with institutional affiliations. The average profile of patients admitted to hospice was a 60-year-old White (89 per cent), female (54.3 per cent) cancer patient (94.5 per cent) whose spouse was primary caregiver (63.8 per cent). Hospices provided a wide variety of both medical and social services provided by volunteers as well as paid staff. It appears that two divergent types of hospices are developing: 1) independent, heavily volunteer hospices with a variety of professional staff delivering a wide array of social/psychological services with unstable funding; and 2) institutionally based hospices providing both inpatient and home care, greater variety of medical/nursing services, less variety of social/psychological services, using fewer types of volunteers and paid staff, and not experiencing funding problems.
Suggested Citation
Buckingham, R.W. & Lupu, D., 1982.
"A comparative study of hospice services in the United States,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 72(5), pages 455-463.
Handle:
RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.72.5.455_8
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.72.5.455
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.72.5.455_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.